<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Personal Reading List for 2008 (so far)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.sanspoint.com/archives/2008/01/01/my-personal-reading-list-for-2008-so-far/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.sanspoint.com/archives/2008/01/01/my-personal-reading-list-for-2008-so-far/</link>
	<description>Separating signifier and signified</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 04:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard J. Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.sanspoint.com/archives/2008/01/01/my-personal-reading-list-for-2008-so-far/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard J. Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 12:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sanspoint.com/archives/2008/01/01/my-personal-reading-list-for-2008-so-far/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Howard West&lt;/strong&gt; - Well, I liked the approximately 500 pages I managed to read of &lt;em&gt;Against the Day&lt;/em&gt; before I had to put it away because I had no time to read it. I'm anxious to get back to it, as I'm a huge Pynchon fan. &lt;em&gt;Gravity's Rainbow&lt;/em&gt; is on my list of books to re-read, and I'm saving &lt;em&gt;Mason &#38; Dixon&lt;/em&gt; for last.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If you've never read Murakami, I would like to suggest starting with either his short story collection, &lt;em&gt;The Elephant Vanishes&lt;/em&gt;, which has my favorite short story of his, "TV People"—which was also the first one of his I read, or to read his masterpiece, &lt;em&gt;The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle&lt;/em&gt;. Really, though, there isn't a bad book in the man's catalog.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Howard West</strong> - Well, I liked the approximately 500 pages I managed to read of <em>Against the Day</em> before I had to put it away because I had no time to read it. I&#8217;m anxious to get back to it, as I&#8217;m a huge Pynchon fan. <em>Gravity&#8217;s Rainbow</em> is on my list of books to re-read, and I&#8217;m saving <em>Mason &amp; Dixon</em> for last.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;ve never read Murakami, I would like to suggest starting with either his short story collection, <em>The Elephant Vanishes</em>, which has my favorite short story of his, &#8220;TV People&#8221;—which was also the first one of his I read, or to read his masterpiece, <em>The Wind-Up Bird Chronicle</em>. Really, though, there isn&#8217;t a bad book in the man&#8217;s catalog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard West</title>
		<link>http://www.sanspoint.com/archives/2008/01/01/my-personal-reading-list-for-2008-so-far/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard West</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 05:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sanspoint.com/archives/2008/01/01/my-personal-reading-list-for-2008-so-far/#comment-31</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Just finished "Against the Day" myself a week or so ago.  If you like Pynchon, there is a lot there to like.  Haven't really made my mind up on it just yet though.  Its a rangy mother, but boy can he write.  Currently reading "Mason &#38; Dixon".  One thing fairly evident in that but missing from "Against the Day" is coherent plot.  But I guess you just accept stuff like that with Pynchon.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also have also read "Kavalier and Clay", "One Hundred Years of Solitude", and "Mao II".  All good choices.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Your other choices also look interesting and include items I've been thinking about myself, particularly Murakami, Saramago and Eggers.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just finished &#8220;Against the Day&#8221; myself a week or so ago.  If you like Pynchon, there is a lot there to like.  Haven&#8217;t really made my mind up on it just yet though.  Its a rangy mother, but boy can he write.  Currently reading &#8220;Mason &amp; Dixon&#8221;.  One thing fairly evident in that but missing from &#8220;Against the Day&#8221; is coherent plot.  But I guess you just accept stuff like that with Pynchon.</p>
<p>Also have also read &#8220;Kavalier and Clay&#8221;, &#8220;One Hundred Years of Solitude&#8221;, and &#8220;Mao II&#8221;.  All good choices.</p>
<p>Your other choices also look interesting and include items I&#8217;ve been thinking about myself, particularly Murakami, Saramago and Eggers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard J. Anderson</title>
		<link>http://www.sanspoint.com/archives/2008/01/01/my-personal-reading-list-for-2008-so-far/#comment-30</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard J. Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 17:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sanspoint.com/archives/2008/01/01/my-personal-reading-list-for-2008-so-far/#comment-30</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, hey, I only have so much money to spend on books that aren't for classes right now, so they've all had to wait.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sedaris is... interesting. I can see why you or someone wouldn't be too into him. I was really caught by the first essay in &lt;em&gt;Naked&lt;/em&gt; though, and the shine never wore off. And, yes, Amy Sedaris is funny as hell.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, hey, I only have so much money to spend on books that aren&#8217;t for classes right now, so they&#8217;ve all had to wait.</p>
<p>Sedaris is&#8230; interesting. I can see why you or someone wouldn&#8217;t be too into him. I was really caught by the first essay in <em>Naked</em> though, and the shine never wore off. And, yes, Amy Sedaris is funny as hell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rev. Syung Myung Me</title>
		<link>http://www.sanspoint.com/archives/2008/01/01/my-personal-reading-list-for-2008-so-far/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>Rev. Syung Myung Me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jan 2008 16:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.sanspoint.com/archives/2008/01/01/my-personal-reading-list-for-2008-so-far/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I'm surprised you haven't got the first three on your list..8)  Kavalier &#38; Clay was really good, I thought.  Heartbreaking Work is very good as well -- particularly the stuff that's not him talking about &lt;i&gt;Might&lt;/i&gt;, but even he has sort of a disclaimer that the &lt;i&gt;Might&lt;/i&gt; stuff might not be as interesting to folks who weren't there.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm kinda torn, myself, on House Of Leaves.  Some of it is really interesting, but I really, really could have done without the wrap-around story featuring the guy who found the novel and was SOOO FREEEAKKKED OUTTTTT by it.  Struck me as a little lame.  (This isn't really a spoiler, the wraparound starts on the first page, and it also talks about him being SFO.)  But the actual novel is pretty dang good and interesting.  It'd be a much stronger book if it weren't for the gimmick of the wraparound.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I want to read Marky Z's other book, but I've heard it's really not that good, even for people who liked House Of Leaves a lot more than I did.  Hum.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;David Sedaris, I've never been able to get into, and sometimes it makes me feel sad that I haven't been able to, like I'm missing something.  But his style just seems to grate on me.  Oh well, I love his sister, though.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised you haven&#8217;t got the first three on your list..8)  Kavalier &amp; Clay was really good, I thought.  Heartbreaking Work is very good as well &#8212; particularly the stuff that&#8217;s not him talking about <i>Might</i>, but even he has sort of a disclaimer that the <i>Might</i> stuff might not be as interesting to folks who weren&#8217;t there.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m kinda torn, myself, on House Of Leaves.  Some of it is really interesting, but I really, really could have done without the wrap-around story featuring the guy who found the novel and was SOOO FREEEAKKKED OUTTTTT by it.  Struck me as a little lame.  (This isn&#8217;t really a spoiler, the wraparound starts on the first page, and it also talks about him being SFO.)  But the actual novel is pretty dang good and interesting.  It&#8217;d be a much stronger book if it weren&#8217;t for the gimmick of the wraparound.</p>
<p>I want to read Marky Z&#8217;s other book, but I&#8217;ve heard it&#8217;s really not that good, even for people who liked House Of Leaves a lot more than I did.  Hum.</p>
<p>David Sedaris, I&#8217;ve never been able to get into, and sometimes it makes me feel sad that I haven&#8217;t been able to, like I&#8217;m missing something.  But his style just seems to grate on me.  Oh well, I love his sister, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
